Learning a New Task

My 5 year old son Aidan just learned to ride a bike.

We noticed that there were 5 or so dimensions to learning to ride a bike:  steering, balance, braking, pedaling, and staying balanced when bragging to strangers on how great you were doing.  We also noticed that it is difficult to attend to all 5 when first learning because none of them are automatic.  I have observed the exact same thing with learning to dance and dog agility.

It got me thinking about my own teaching and observing the teaching of others.  How many times have teachers asked you to attend to many different things at once?  It does seem better, if you can, to work more sequentially through different aspects of a new skill.  This is possible even in biking through the use of a balance bike or just coasting down a hill without pedaling, which works on balance.  That’s why I also recommend, in my robotics courses to teachers, that you don’t have to have students, especially young students, do all the tasks in a WeDo lesson, for example.  You can choose to focus on building, programming, or the experiment parts of the Lego WeDo curriculum.

Posted in Child Development | Leave a comment

Another Example of Natural Kid Engineering

I posted previously on ways that kids are natural engineers at school with their fairy houses and gnome homes.  On vacation at the beach, another one became apparent, sand castles.  Such a great way to explore materials and building!  You can definitely see the natural interest and enthusiasm for it at the beach!

Here’s some photos from today.

 

Posted in Child Development | Leave a comment

Tracking Engineering Skills Over Time

I am trying to think of a good way to track engineering skills over time.  I will be tracking this year’s K class as they progress to sixth grade.  Is there a task I can give them that will work over all these years?  I thought making a chair (from the Tufts CEEO first grade lesson) but could it involve robots later?  Ideally, it was be the same or similar so we could easily see the changes but what would work over such a long time and such a change in development?

Posted in Child Development, Robotics | 3 Comments

BeeBot Class

I taught my first BeeBot class for teachers and it went great! BeeBots are small premade robots meant for early elementary students.  I used them in PK and K.  I was not sure there was enough for a whole day but we spent most of the day on BeeBots. The teachers were very motivated to try it. Hope they can find some funds to purchase the BeeBots. I also gave my new general robotics talk at the start and that was great practice. I think it’s really good and I found a few mistakes this time that I have corrected. The quotes and videos and photos seem to make it!

Posted in Robotics, Teaching | Tagged | Leave a comment

New Talk; New Methods

I spent about 3 hours yesterday working on a presentation explaining why we should teach engineering to young students.  I am trying to make my presentations more like TED talks with big ideas and lots of visuals.  It is still hard for me to get away totally from the Powerpoint bullets, which more than anything, remind me what to say.  But I am using the presenter notes feature of Keynote to help and using lots of visuals: movies, photos of kids and their Lego robotics creations, and scans of student work.  I have 2 one day workshops coming up (one on BeeBots and one on BeeBots, WeDo, and NXT all together, which should be interesting), a short talk on robotics for kids for our district convocation, and an hour long presentation for a tech conference in the fall.

Posted in Robotics, Technology | Leave a comment

Fear and Learning

Aidan is spending lots of time in the water.  A few weeks ago, we were swimming at Beaver Lake in Ware, Massachusetts and were out on a dock.  I have expected for sometime that he would be close to jumping in the water by himself.  Up to this point, I hold both his hands and swing him into the water.  We do this at the Conway Pool (really a pond) where I can stand and he is up higher on a dock.  At Beaver Lake, he was afraid to jump right in from the (level to the water) dock.

I thought of tossing him in because I thought there was a good chance he would really like it and that it would help him to jump in by himself.  However, when I suggested it, he got upset and made it clear that he did NOT want me to do that.  But gently lowering him into the water and holding onto him until he was fully “in” was not moving him forward in his water play.  After considering throwing him anyway for a while, I thought, “Is there something in between?”  So I suggested lifting him and dropping him into the water from low to higher distance.  After and initial resistance, I dropped him in and he loved it and asked for more.  “I want to do that again, Dad.”  That’s one of his favorite expressions associated with learning and play along with, “Watch me!”

Well, I dropped him from different heights trying to push the height as much as I could.  We had very fun time.  He was still not ready to jump in though.

Yesterday, before we went to his grandfather’s pool, I suggested that he might be ready to jump in all by himself today. Sure enough, he was ready this week.  He was very proud of himself and even jumped in the deep end.  I will have to get some video of this.  The whole thing reminded me of Vigotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, which suggests that kids always have an zone of where they can go next in their learning and that it is best to push it but not too much.

Posted in Child Development | Leave a comment

Social Media and Blogging

It’s getting complicated!  Now that I am using Twitter, Google+, and FaceBook and have work and home identities, I want to be able to automatically share new blog entries (I have work and home blogs too) without duplicating too much.  I set up my WordPress blogs with a little widget that has TW, G+, and FB buttons.  The TW and FB ones work great but don’t go to work and home identities.  The G+ one does not seem to work.  I use Networking Blogs on FaceBook too but that now is creating duplicates so I need to take that out I guess.  Anyone have a nice clean solution?

 

Posted in Tech | Leave a comment

Fairy House Engineering

I was thinking today about Fairy Houses, also known as Gnome Homes, when I saw a bunch of them at my son’s YMCA camp.  We also see these at the elementary school where I work.  I wonder if these fill a need for engineering/building that is not fulfilled at school.  We also typically see these more of an interest for girls, which is interesting.  In any case, another great way to explore engineering!

Photo from http://www.fairyhouses.com/

Photo of a typical Fairy House

Posted in Child Development | Leave a comment

Research Directions; Which Way To Go?

I plan on continuing to implement and document the PK-6 Elementary Engineering Curriculum I have been developing.  That is clear.  What is less clear is the direction to go with my associated research.

Many intriguing possible areas have come up but I will need to focus on a couple of them.

  1. How does interest and engagement is robotics relate to the creative play/fantasy play we see in children?  How does this relate to the work of Erikson, Gardner (Multiple Intelligences), Vigotsky, and Piaget?
  2. Is there a clear developmental progression in creative play/building/engineering interest/development of PK-6 children?
  3. Why is robotics so engaging, especially to students that either need more challenges or (generally) boys who have learning or attention issues but are very successful with hands on building projects.  How does this fit in with the Activated Learner research from the Moore Foundation?

I am thinking that due to my own limited resources, I may wish to track a small number of children starting from PK or K and with the use of video of their work and video and written interview and reflections, develop some case studies of children’s engineering development over 7 or 8 years.  I will also pursue grants and collaborations that support this work.  I would love to get some feedback on which of the 3 areas above would be most helpful in your own work.

 

 

Posted in Child Development, Research, Robotics | 5 Comments

What Do The Student Quotes Mean?

I received this analysis of the student robotics quotes from graduate student Lama Jaber.  I found it to be an excellent summary.  Here it is.

 

First, at an affective level, the robotic experience seems to be
triggering very good feelings, coming both from it being a fun
experience, an empowering and challenging experience, and an
opportunity to feel a  sense of achievement (I did it!) and ownership
which seems really rewarding to these kids, and finally as something
that is different from the rest of the school work (it is interesting
that this was pretty prevalent in kids’ responses)

Second, on an epistemological sense in terms of how one gets to know
something or gets to learn in robotics, their experiences seem to
promote a view of learning as figuring things out, relying on one’s
efforts rather than on an outside authority (book, or teacher…),
integrating skills and knowledge from various domains such as math
science, and writing (though this was maybe mentioned only twice, I
found it pretty powerful!), also an appreciation of persistence and
failure as a central and desirable aspect of learning: failure as an
opportunity for a new way of thinking and opening up to new
perspectives.

Posted in Child Development, Research, Robotics | Leave a comment