Drumming Monkey – The Science of Rhythm

I have struggled for years with the science experiment part of the LEGO WeDo Drumming Monkey robot. The experiment workshop tells the students to write down “What I see or hear.” Without further instruction, second grade students tend to write things like, “Da da da da da.” Even though that is a description of what they heard, it does not at all capture the relationship between the position of the cam gears and the drumming patterns. So, for years, I tried to get the students focus on the frequency and pattern of the beats. This worked better but the second grade teacher and I were still not satisfied with the results. She suggested a more systematic approach to writing down the patterns but the first and fourth rows (see below) are really the same pattern without a reference to an actual beat such as 30 beats/minute.

She found a good iPad metronome app that has an option to count 1, 2, 3, 4. I came up with a modified worksheet that will allow the students to precisely describe the patterns. This also related directly to what the music teacher is teaching them. We have not tried it yet but we are excited to see what happens next week.

It is interesting how long it can take for solutions to these teaching problems to occur.

Note that if you mentally superimpose the left and right cams and envision them going around, it is easy to see how it works. However, this formal operation would not be available for students until they were entering adolescence.

DrummingMonkeyAnswerKey

Posted in Child Development, Research, Robotics, Teaching | Leave a comment

Burglar Alarm Trap

Here’s a recent grade 4 burglar alarm model. The burglar is detected by a motion sensor, a trap is lowered, and the police arrest the burglar.

Posted in Robotics, Technology | Leave a comment

Mega Vehicle

Here’s a recent third grade mega vehicle made for the open ended make your own vehicle WeDo challenge.  Big Car

Posted in Robotics | Leave a comment

Local Newspaper Article About Book

http://www.gazettenet.com/home/10155020-95/williamsburg-school-technology-director-john-heffernan-publishes-book-on-teaching-robotics

Posted in Robotics | Leave a comment

Robotics and Technology Blog

My Robotics and Technology Blog is at http://www.kidsengineer.com/

Posted in Tech | Leave a comment

Taxonomy of Robotics Skills

I have been thinking about a how robotics skills intersect. This Venn diagram show my first stab at a taxonomy of robotics skills and how engineering, programming, and building intersect in educational robotics. This still needs work but I would welcome any comments and feedback.Robotics Skills

Posted in Research, Robotics, Teaching | 2 Comments

Design Based Science Bibliography

Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 289–307.
Baynes, K. (1994). Designerly play. Loughborough: Loughborough University of Technology, Department of Design and Technology.
Brophy, S., Portsmore, M., Klein, S., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3).
Confrey, J. (1990). A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3–56.
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
Fleer, M. (1999). The science of technology: Young children working technologically. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(3), 269–291.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855–879. doi:10.1080/09500690500038165
Hmelo, C. E., Holden, D. A., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to Learn about Complex Systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,, 9(3), 247–298.
Hynes, M., Crismond, D., & Brizuela, B. (2010). AC 2010-447: MIDDLE-SCHOOL TEACHERS’ USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGE. American Society for Engineering Education.
Kendall, M. A. L. M., & Wendell, K. (2012). AC 2012-4068: UNDERSTANDING THE BELIEFS AND PERCEPTIONS OF TEACHERS WHO CHOOSE TO IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING-BASED SCIENCE INSTRUCTION. Presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/file_server/papers/attachment/file/0002/3140/ASEE_Paper_Final_Draft.pdf
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., & Holbrook, J. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design (TM) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
Leonard, M. J., & Derry, S. J. (2011). “What’s the Science Behind It?” The Interaction of Engineering and Science Goals, Knowledge, and Practices in a Design-Based Science Activity. Retrieved from http://widaredesign.wceruw.org/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2011_05.pdf
McRobbie, C. J., Stein, S. J., & Ginns, I. (2001). Exploring designerly thinking of students as novice designers. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 91–116.
Mehalik, M. M., Doplet, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 75=81.
Narode, R. B. (2011). “‘Math in a Can’”: Teaching Mathematics and Engineering Design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 3.
Nourbakhsh, I. R., Hamner, E., Crowley, K., & Wilkinson, K. (2004). Formal measures of learning in a secondary school mobile robotics course. In Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1831–1836). Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1308090
Nugent, G., Barker, B. S., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/tedfacpub/33/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unomaha.edu%2Ftedfacpub%2F33&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Outterside, Y. (1993). The emergence of design ability: The early years. Retrieved from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2134/1574
Perova, N., Johnson, W. H., & Rogers, C. (2008). USING LEGO BASED ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING CONCEPTS OF SPEED, VELOCITY, AND ACCELERATION. American Society for Engineering Education.
Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Distributed Scaffolding: Helping Students Learn Science from Design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching`, 42(2), 185–217.
Roth, W.-M. (1996). Art and Artifact of Children’s Designing: A Situated Cognition Perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129–166.
Schunn, C. D. (2009). How Kids Learn Engineering:  The Cognitive Science Perspective. National Academy of Engineering, The Bridge, 39(3). Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/16145/16214.aspx?layoutChange=Normal&PS=10&PI=0&TC=8&BBM=0
Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373–394. doi:10.1002/tea.20238
Wagner, S. P. (1999). Robotics and Children Science Achievement and Problem Solving. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 9(2), 149–192.
Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the Tacit Strategies of Novice Designers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(1), 19–33.
Wendell, K. B. (2011). Science through Engineering in Elementary School: Comparing Three Enactments of an Engineering-Design-Based Curriculum on the Science of Sound. ProQuest LLC. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED528030
Wendell, K. B., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Elementary students’ learning of materials science practices through instruction based on engineering design tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 580–601.
Wendell, K., Connolly, K., Wright, C., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marculu, I. (2010). AC 2010-863: POSTER, INCORPORATING ENGINEERING DESIGN INTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCIENCE CURRICULA.pdf. Presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL: American Society for Engineering Education.
Wendell, M. K. B., & Portsmore, M. D. (2011). AC 2011-904: THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING-BASED SCIENCE IN-STRUCTION ON SCIENCE CONTENT UNDERSTANDING. Presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/file_server/papers/attachment/file/0001/1144/Draft_ASEE2011_Wendell_version2.pdf
Williams, D., Ma, Y., Lai, G., Prejean, L., & Ford, M. J. (2007). Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2007, pp. 3437–3444). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25146/
Posted in Research, Robotics | Leave a comment

Grade 3 Vehicle Challenge

Here are some photos from our grade 3 open ended challenge to design a WeDo vehicle.  I reviewed 3 ways to connect motor to wheels before they started: gears, pulleys, or direct drives. Students used the base WeDo kit. However, I added additional long axles and tires/wheel from the WeDo Resource kit.

Grade3 Vehicles 1

Students were trying first to make a stable chassis out of rubber bands.

Gifted Builder

This student and his partner quickly came up with a functional car design. He does many building projects at home with his father. He quickly built a chassis and drive train.

Grade3 Vehicles 3

Notice the double belt

Grade3 Vehicles 4

These students built the drive train (out of gears first) before building the chassis.

Grade3 Vehicles 5

This was the final car from the student who is a gifted builder. They hid the engine under some LEGO plates and added a realistic steering wheel.

Grade3 Vehicles 6

These students decided the more belts, the better. However, I believe they will be in opposition to each other and one will have to be removed.

Grade3 Vehicles 7

Here’s another gear design. Usually, belts designs are easier than gear designs. However, 2 teams came up with good gear designs.

 

One girl did some design drawings, which is unusual without it being required.  I suggested it but did not require it.

 

DrawingRotated

Posted in Child Development, Research, Robotics, Teaching | 5 Comments

Design Based Science

A few of you may be interested in this literature review of design based science I just completed.  It reviews a good number of papers and studies that evaluate how science concepts and processes can be taught using design.  Design includes engineering and robotics.  Here’s the abstract.

Although robotics has been identified as a promising way to increase STEM interest and also teach science concepts (Brophy, Portsmore, Klein, & Rogers, 2008), there is no research of student use of robotics in a sustained elementary program.  The studies that do exist show promising results for short term robotics programs in middle and high school (Hynes, 2007; Sullivan, 2008).  There are many studies that use design, engineering, or robotics as a way to teach science concepts. This literature review examines relevant papers on using design to teach science and engineering concepts.  The goal of the review is to determine the most relevant theoretical frameworks and methodologies that can be used or modified in a longitudinal case study of elementary robotics students.  A model for classifying the studies is presented.  The studies uniformly use a constructivist, constructionist, and social constructivist approach.  The studies vary in the age group studied, study methodologies, and the secondary goals of the instruction apart from the science focus. The studies report positive results but differ in their recommendations for instruction strategies.  However, common themes are providing appropriate scaffolding to connect the design tasks to specific science concepts and processes.

Because the orientation changed, it was inexplicably split into 3 pieces when I created the PDF from Word.

DesignBasedScienceLitReview

DesignBasedScienceLitReview.2

DesignBasedScienceLitReview.3

Posted in Child Development, Research, Robotics | Leave a comment

Book Now Available!

https://www.createspace.com/4488315

Toddlers, preschoolers, and kindergarteners are natural engineers. They love sand castles, blocks, fairy houses, and other projects that support their creative, fantasy play. We support this natural engineering instinct in preschool and kindergarten classrooms with blocks, LEGOs, sand and water tables, and other activities. As students reach first grade and beyond, we remove all these activities from school. Yet we still expect them be interested in engineering when they get to high school and college.

The Elementary Engineering Curriculum (EEC), described in this book, supports students’ natural engineering interests all through elementary school. The EEC delivers a preschool to grade six engineering experience based on BeeBot, and LEGO WeDo, NXT, and EV3 robotics. Each year, students have at least one robotics unit. In grades K, two, three, four, six, students also have an open ended engineering challenge. The EEC explicitly teaches the engineering design process in an age appropriate way. Robotics provides very high interest, motivating, and deep learning experience for students. This book contains rationale, descriptions, research, and teaching tips on elementary robotics as well as complete lesson plans and standards alignment for the curriculum.

Posted in Robotics, Teaching | 1 Comment